On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:32:18 +0200, Peter wrote: >wouldn't that be on >80ms latency. If that's the order where >'disturbing' starts then I find that number interesting, as (if I >remember correctly) that's the fastest scale a human can react. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ bpm2ms 90 | grep 1/32 (60000ms/90BPM)*4*(1/32)= ~83.33333333333333333333ms So this would be 1/32 note at 90 BPM. This is something a musician should notice, let alone that artists are not seldom "freaks", e.g. savants, autists etc., some even without being aware to "suffer" from autism or something similar. >But brain might be cheating in assuming having played We are at least aware of what was played already before, what already is "processed" by the brain. So I wouldn't it call it "cheating", but what we are doing is based on "extrapolation". You were to late, the brain takes a while to notice this and then you compensate it. A good musician isn't to late, a beginner often is out of time. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
