On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:40:43 +0000 Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Inspired by this thread, I dared to coin the question 'how would > you feel about an EQ plugin that analyses the track it's in, gets > information from its peers in other tracks, and then adjusts itself ?' > > Result: general hilarity. Consensus was that this the most stupid > thing ever suggested. Had to take some action to avoid damage to > my own reputation. I would laugh too. EQ, in the general sense, is not used for such purposes as sketched here. Subtractive, yes, perhaps. Since it might be fairly reasonable to identify what to ditch out at the beginning of any mix job. But then that's a perhaps. When transposing the dynamics of this discussion a bit further, then no wonder it's such a mess at the United Nations. Take what this guy said, interpret it w/o fully understanding it, then serve it to comparses for a good laugh. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
