On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:15:15 -0400, jonetsu wrote: >On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:40:43 +0000 Fons Adriaensen wrote: > >> Inspired by this thread, I dared to coin the question 'how would >> you feel about an EQ plugin that analyses the track it's in, gets >> information from its peers in other tracks, and then adjusts >> itself ?' >> >> Result: general hilarity. Consensus was that this the most stupid >> thing ever suggested. Had to take some action to avoid damage to >> my own reputation. > >I would laugh too. > >EQ, in the general sense, is not used for such purposes as sketched >here. Subtractive, yes, perhaps. Since it might be fairly reasonable >to identify what to ditch out at the beginning of any mix job. But >then that's a perhaps. Faders and EQs are the most important tools during the complete mixing procedure. You can do a mix without any additional tool, but you can't without faders and EQs. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
