On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:52:36 +0100 Chris Cannam <cannam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, at 21:43, Jeremy Carter wrote: > > What does the AI community think of it though? > > Dunno about AI exactly, but the auto-mixing area is quite a popular > topic in academia. The AES workshop on intelligent music production > (http://www.aes-uk.org/forthcoming-meetings/wimp2/ - hosted by the group > I work in) covered some of this ground, to interesting but inconclusive > ends. > > The SAFE plugins (http://www.semanticaudio.co.uk/) are related as well: > based on crowdsourced mappings between musical terminology and plugin > parameters, rather than on inputs from surrounding tracks, but the > mechanism is vaguely similar. > > I'm working on a project about shared feature requisition from tracks at > the moment, though I don't know whether it would be directly applicable > to this sort of use. > > > Chris Not a recording engineer myself (and never will be) but I do know a couple. When I tried to describe this as best I could to one today he jumped in with "Automation. Great. Provided I'm the one who set it up and know exactly what is happening at all times". -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
