Of course audio engineers would think something which could potentially put them out of work was stupid (or something they *think* could never put them out of work). What does the AI community think of it though?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:25:26PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The audio engineer with the promotionally effective name demands
> another audio engineer for this kind of assistance. IOW a human does
> the mix and another human does the fine tuning. This is quasi the
> counterpart of what Fons already mentioned. Let iZotope's Track
> Assitant/Neutron do the mix, then use iZotope's Track Assitant/Neutron
> to do the fine tuning of the mix it produced before.
I spent most the evening with a group a sound engineers, discussing
things ranging from mixing desk ergonomics to how to approach a
particular mix that our host presented as an example of his work.
Inspired by this thread, I dared to coin the question 'how would
you feel about an EQ plugin that analyses the track it's in, gets
information from its peers in other tracks, and then adjusts itself ?'
Result: general hilarity. Consensus was that this the most stupid
thing ever suggested. Had to take some action to avoid damage to
my own reputation.
Ciao,
--
FA
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
