On Tue 23 Mar 13:27 CDT 2021, Elliot Berman wrote: > On 3/22/2021 8:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-03-07 09:42:45) > > > On Sat 06 Mar 00:18 CST 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > > Quoting Elliot Berman (2021-03-05 10:18:09) > > > > > On 3/3/2021 10:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > Quoting Elliot Berman (2021-03-03 19:35:08) > > > > > > > > > > > + desc.args[0] = flags; > > > > > > + desc.args[1] = virt_to_phys(entry); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + return scm_legacy_call_atomic(NULL, &desc, NULL); > > > > > > +} > > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr); > > > > > > > > > > This should still be qcom_scm_call. > > > > > > > > You mean s/scm_legacy_call_atomic/qcom_scm_call/ right? > > > > > > > > I don't really want to resend the rest of the patches if this last one > > > > is the only one that needs an update. This was a semi-RFC anyway so > > > > maybe it's fine if the first 5 patches get merged and then I can resend > > > > this one? Otherwise I will resend this again next week or so with less > > > > diff for this patch. > > > > > > I'm fine with merging the first 5, but was hoping that Elliot could > > > provide either a "Reviewed-by" or at least an "Acked-by" on these. > > > > > > > I'll take the silence as I should resend the whole series? > > > > I thought Bjorn was accepting the first 5 already, my apologies. > > Patches 1-5: > Acked-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Elliot. I'll pick up the first 5, so please skip these in your repost, Stephen. Regards, Bjorn
