On 3/22/2021 8:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-03-07 09:42:45)
On Sat 06 Mar 00:18 CST 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Elliot Berman (2021-03-05 10:18:09)
On 3/3/2021 10:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Elliot Berman (2021-03-03 19:35:08)
> + desc.args[0] = flags;
> + desc.args[1] = virt_to_phys(entry);
> +
> + return scm_legacy_call_atomic(NULL, &desc, NULL);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr);
This should still be qcom_scm_call.
You mean s/scm_legacy_call_atomic/qcom_scm_call/ right?
I don't really want to resend the rest of the patches if this last one
is the only one that needs an update. This was a semi-RFC anyway so
maybe it's fine if the first 5 patches get merged and then I can resend
this one? Otherwise I will resend this again next week or so with less
diff for this patch.
I'm fine with merging the first 5, but was hoping that Elliot could
provide either a "Reviewed-by" or at least an "Acked-by" on these.
I'll take the silence as I should resend the whole series?
I thought Bjorn was accepting the first 5 already, my apologies.
Patches 1-5:
Acked-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
