On 20-12-19, 08:44, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2019-12-19 23:04, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > We already define register offsets so use them in register layout.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> > b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> > index c2e800a3825a..06f971ca518e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> > @@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ static const unsigned int
> > sdm845_ufsphy_regs_layout[] = {
> > };
> >
> > static const unsigned int sm8150_ufsphy_regs_layout[] = {
> > - [QPHY_START_CTRL] = 0x00,
> > - [QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS] = 0x180,
> > + [QPHY_START_CTRL] = QPHY_V4_PHY_START,
> > + [QPHY_SW_RESET] = QPHY_V4_SW_RESET,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct qmp_phy_init_tbl msm8996_pcie_serdes_tbl[] = {
>
> Why is the QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS removed here? Then what "status" are we
> polling here for UFS PHY?
>
> <snip>
> if (cfg->type == PHY_TYPE_UFS) {
> status = pcs + cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS];
> mask = PCS_READY;
> ready = PCS_READY;
> } else {
> <snip>
Good catch Can, I dont think I intended it that way. Will fix it up!
Thanks
--
~Vinod
