Re: [PATCH 2/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Use register defines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-12-19 23:04, Vinod Koul wrote:
We already define register offsets so use them in register layout.

Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
index c2e800a3825a..06f971ca518e 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
@@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ static const unsigned int sdm845_ufsphy_regs_layout[] = {
 };

 static const unsigned int sm8150_ufsphy_regs_layout[] = {
-	[QPHY_START_CTRL]		= 0x00,
-	[QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS]		= 0x180,
+	[QPHY_START_CTRL]		= QPHY_V4_PHY_START,
+	[QPHY_SW_RESET]			= QPHY_V4_SW_RESET,
 };

 static const struct qmp_phy_init_tbl msm8996_pcie_serdes_tbl[] = {

Why is the QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS removed here? Then what "status" are we
polling here for UFS PHY?

<snip>
     if (cfg->type == PHY_TYPE_UFS) {
         status = pcs + cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS];
         mask = PCS_READY;
         ready = PCS_READY;
     } else {
<snip>

Can Guo.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux