Hey Evan,
On 12/7/19 12:46 AM, Evan Green wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:42 AM Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Evan/Georgi,
https://git.linaro.org/people/georgi.djakov/linux.git/commit/?h=icc-dev&id=9197da7d06e88666d1588e3c21a743e60381264d
With the "Redefine interconnect provider
DT nodes for SDM845" series, wouldn't it
make more sense to define the OSM_L3 icc
nodes in the sdm845.c icc driver and have
the common helpers in osm_l3 driver? Though
we don't plan on linking the OSM L3 nodes
to the other nodes on SDM845/SC7180, we
might have GPU needing to be linked to the
OSM L3 nodes on future SoCs. Let me know
how you want this done.
Anyway I'll re-spin the series once the
SDM845 icc re-work gets re-posted.
I don't have a clear picture of the proposal. You'd put the couple of
extra defines in sdm845.c for the new nodes. But then you'd need to do
something in icc_set() of sdm845. Is that when you'd call out to the
osm_l3 driver?
with sdm845 icc rework "https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11293399/";
osm l3 icc provider needs to know the total number of rsc icc nodes,
i.e I can define the total number of rsc nodes and continue using the
same design as v3 since on sdm845/sc7180 gpu is not cache coherent.
or have the osm l3 table population logic and osm icc_set as helpers
and have it called from the sdm845/sc7180 icc driver so that we would
be able to link osm_l3 with rsc nodes on future qcom SoCs.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc, is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
