Hey Evan,
Thanks for taking time to review
the series.
On 2019-11-19 04:12, Evan Green wrote:
Hi Sibi,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 7:45 AM Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On some Qualcomm SoCs, Operating State Manager (OSM) controls the
resources of scaling L3 caches. Add a driver to handle bandwidth
requests to OSM L3 from CPU/GPU.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c | 284
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 293 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig
b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig
index ecf057d7e2409..17aee5b0f15b7 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig
@@ -5,6 +5,13 @@ config INTERCONNECT_QCOM
help
Support for Qualcomm's Network-on-Chip interconnect
hardware.
+config INTERCONNECT_QCOM_OSM_L3
+ tristate "Qualcomm OSM L3 interconnect driver"
+ depends on INTERCONNECT_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
Should we depend on something sdm845 here?
not really...
maybe I can have 845 interconnect
selecting osm_l3? since sc7180 also
would be doing the same.
+ help
+ Say y here to support the Operating State Manager (OSM)
interconnect
+ driver which controls the scaling of L3 caches on Qualcomm
SoCs.
+
config INTERCONNECT_QCOM_QCS404
tristate "Qualcomm QCS404 interconnect driver"
depends on INTERCONNECT_QCOM
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile
b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile
index 9adf9e380545e..8d86d6515ffc9 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+icc-osm-l3-objs := osm-l3.o
qnoc-msm8974-objs := msm8974.o
qnoc-qcs404-objs := qcs404.o
qnoc-sdm845-objs := sdm845.o
icc-smd-rpm-objs := smd-rpm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_QCOM_OSM_L3) += icc-osm-l3.o
obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_QCOM_MSM8974) += qnoc-msm8974.o
obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_QCOM_QCS404) += qnoc-qcs404.o
obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_QCOM_SDM845) += qnoc-sdm845.o
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..5e9f9ce02863b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm845.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
+#define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 40U
+#define LUT_SRC GENMASK(31, 30)
+#define LUT_L_VAL GENMASK(7, 0)
+#define LUT_ROW_SIZE 32
+#define CLK_HW_DIV 2
+
+/* Register offsets */
+#define REG_ENABLE 0x0
+#define REG_FREQ_LUT 0x110
+#define REG_PERF_STATE 0x920
+
+#define OSM_L3_MAX_LINKS 1
+
+#define to_qcom_provider(_provider) \
+ container_of(_provider, struct qcom_osm_l3_icc_provider,
provider)
+
+enum {
+ SDM845_MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS = SLAVE_TCU + 1,
+ SDM845_SLAVE_OSM_L3,
+};
Should these just go in qcom,sdm845.h? Seems nice to have them all in
one place, and then they can be accessed in the DT if needed.
yeah I can do that, by doing
this I can also get rid of the
SLAVE_TCU + 1 :)
+
+struct qcom_osm_l3_icc_provider {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ unsigned int max_state;
+ unsigned long lut_tables[LUT_MAX_ENTRIES];
+ struct icc_provider provider;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct qcom_icc_node - Qualcomm specific interconnect nodes
+ * @name: the node name used in debugfs
+ * @links: an array of nodes where we can go next while traversing
+ * @id: a unique node identifier
+ * @num_links: the total number of @links
+ * @buswidth: width of the interconnect between a node and the bus
+ */
+struct qcom_icc_node {
+ const char *name;
+ u16 links[OSM_L3_MAX_LINKS];
+ u16 id;
+ u16 num_links;
+ u16 buswidth;
+};
+
+struct qcom_icc_desc {
+ struct qcom_icc_node **nodes;
+ size_t num_nodes;
+};
+
+#define DEFINE_QNODE(_name, _id, _buswidth, ...)
\
+ static struct qcom_icc_node _name = {
\
+ .name = #_name,
\
+ .id = _id,
\
+ .buswidth = _buswidth,
\
+ .num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(((int[]){ __VA_ARGS__ })),
\
+ .links = { __VA_ARGS__ },
\
+ }
+
+DEFINE_QNODE(osm_apps_l3, SDM845_MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS, 16,
SDM845_SLAVE_OSM_L3);
+DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3, SDM845_SLAVE_OSM_L3, 16);
+
+static struct qcom_icc_node *sdm845_osm_l3_nodes[] = {
const?
unfortunately we can't ...
data->nodes[i] = node;
we setup links later ^^ with
the pointer.
+ [MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS] = &osm_apps_l3,
+ [SLAVE_OSM_L3] = &osm_l3,
+};
+
+static struct qcom_icc_desc sdm845_osm_l3 = {
+ .nodes = sdm845_osm_l3_nodes,
+ .num_nodes = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_osm_l3_nodes),
+};
+
+static int qcom_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32
avg_bw,
+ u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32
*agg_peak)
+{
+ *agg_avg += avg_bw;
+ *agg_peak = max_t(u32, *agg_peak, peak_bw);
+
+ return 0;
+}
Georgi, I wonder if it's a good idea to make a small collection of
"std" aggregate functions in the interconnect core that a driver can
just point to if it's doing something super standard like this (ie
driver->aggregate = icc_std_aggregate;). This is probably fine as-is
for now, but if we see a lot more copy/pastes of this function we
should think about it.
+
+static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
+{
+ struct qcom_osm_l3_icc_provider *qp;
+ struct icc_provider *provider;
+ struct qcom_icc_node *qn;
+ struct icc_node *n;
+ unsigned int index;
+ u32 agg_peak = 0;
+ u32 agg_avg = 0;
+ u64 rate;
+
+ qn = src->data;
+ provider = src->provider;
+ qp = to_qcom_provider(provider);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(n, &provider->nodes, node_list)
+ qcom_icc_aggregate(n, 0, n->avg_bw, n->peak_bw,
+ &agg_avg, &agg_peak);
+
+ rate = max(agg_avg, agg_peak);
+ rate = icc_units_to_bps(rate);
+ do_div(rate, qn->buswidth);
+
+ for (index = 0; index < qp->max_state; index++) {
If the rate is too high, you'll end up setting max_state into the
register. That's probably bad, right? (Or maybe it's not because the
table ends with the same value twice, but it seems like relying on an
implementation detail). We could guard against that by only iterating
to index < qp->max_state - 1.
yes, using max_state - 1 makes sense
here. Will change this in the next
re-spin.
+ if (qp->lut_tables[index] >= rate)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ writel_relaxed(index, qp->base + REG_PERF_STATE);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_osm_l3_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct qcom_osm_l3_icc_provider *qp =
platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct icc_provider *provider = &qp->provider;
+ struct icc_node *n;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(n, &provider->nodes, node_list) {
There was a comment on one of the other threads that we've been
copy/pasting this snippet around and it's wrong because it doesn't use
the _safe variant of the macro. So we end up destroying the list we're
iterating over.
Georgi, did you have a plan to refactor this, or should we just change
this to be the _safe version?
+ icc_node_del(n);
+ icc_node_destroy(n->id);
+ }
+
+ return icc_provider_del(provider);
+}
+
+static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ u32 info, src, lval, i, prev_freq = 0, freq;
+ static unsigned long hw_rate, xo_rate;
+ struct qcom_osm_l3_icc_provider *qp;
+ const struct qcom_icc_desc *desc;
+ struct icc_onecell_data *data;
+ struct icc_provider *provider;
+ struct qcom_icc_node **qnodes;
+ struct icc_node *node;
+ size_t num_nodes;
+ struct clk *clk;
+ int ret;
+
+ clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "xo");
+ if (IS_ERR(clk))
+ return PTR_ERR(clk);
+
+ xo_rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ clk_put(clk);
+
+ clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "alternate");
+ if (IS_ERR(clk))
+ return PTR_ERR(clk);
+
+ hw_rate = clk_get_rate(clk) / CLK_HW_DIV;
It's a little weird there's a constant divide in there, though I guess
it's in the cpufreq driver as well. I guess this is fine if it's
likely to stay there (and the same) when this driver is generalized
for other SoCs.
yeah I don't see this changing
on sc7180 so I'll leave this
as is.
+ clk_put(clk);
+
+ qp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!qp)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ qp->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(qp->base))
+ return PTR_ERR(qp->base);
+
+ /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
+ if (!(readl_relaxed(qp->base + REG_ENABLE) & 0x1)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error hardware not enabled\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
+ info = readl_relaxed(qp->base + REG_FREQ_LUT +
+ i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
+ src = FIELD_GET(LUT_SRC, info);
+ lval = FIELD_GET(LUT_L_VAL, info);
+ if (src)
+ freq = xo_rate * lval;
+ else
+ freq = hw_rate;
+
+ /*
+ * Two of the same frequencies with the same core
counts means
"core counts" seems like a copied comment that doesn't apply.
yes we don't use the core_cnt
field so will update the comment.
But you only look at freq and not core count, is that really
equivalent to the table's boundary condition? Or do you need to be
comparing info == info_prev?
no we can get by comparing
current freq with prev freq
on OSM L3.
+ * end of table
+ */
+ if (i > 0 && prev_freq == freq)
+ break;
+
+ qp->lut_tables[i] = freq;
+ prev_freq = freq;
+ }
+ qp->max_state = i;
Should we error out or complain if there are too few entries, or if
the table is not in increasing order?
OSM does make sure of the
increasing order and correct
number of freq entries if the
REG_ENABLE is set. However I
don't really mind adding the
increasing order check but we
can't really detect too few
entries since the number can
vary across SKUs.
+
+ desc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!desc)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ qnodes = desc->nodes;
+ num_nodes = desc->num_nodes;
+
+ data = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_nodes, sizeof(*node),
GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ provider = &qp->provider;
+ provider->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ provider->set = qcom_icc_set;
+ provider->aggregate = qcom_icc_aggregate;
+ provider->xlate = of_icc_xlate_onecell;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&provider->nodes);
+ provider->data = data;
+
+ ret = icc_provider_add(provider);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error adding interconnect
provider\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++) {
+ size_t j;
+
+ node = icc_node_create(qnodes[i]->id);
+ if (IS_ERR(node)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(node);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ node->name = qnodes[i]->name;
+ node->data = qnodes[i];
+ icc_node_add(node, provider);
+
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "registered node %p %s %d\n",
node,
+ qnodes[i]->name, node->id);
+
+ /* populate links */
Not a super useful comment.
lol will remove it
+ for (j = 0; j < qnodes[i]->num_links; j++)
+ icc_link_create(node, qnodes[i]->links[j]);
+
+ data->nodes[i] = node;
+ }
+ data->num_nodes = num_nodes;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, qp);
+
+ return ret;
+err:
+ qcom_osm_l3_remove(pdev);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id osm_l3_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", .data = &sdm845_osm_l3
},
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, osm_l3_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver osm_l3_driver = {
+ .probe = qcom_osm_l3_probe,
+ .remove = qcom_osm_l3_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "osm-l3",
+ .of_match_table = osm_l3_of_match,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(osm_l3_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm OSM L3 interconnect driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
