Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-01-30 08:36:11)
[..]
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mmcc_msm8998_match_table);
> +
> +static int mmcc_msm8998_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int i, ret;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct clk *c;
> +
> + c = devm_clk_get(dev, "xo");
> + if (!IS_ERR(c))
> + dummy_xo_init.parent_names =
> + (const char *[]){__clk_get_name(c)};
> + else
> + return PTR_ERR(c);
> +
> + c = devm_clk_get(dev, "gpll0");
> + if (!IS_ERR(c))
> + dummy_gpll0_init.parent_names =
> + (const char *[]){__clk_get_name(c)};
> + else
> + return PTR_ERR(c);
Urgh, my parent mapping series can't come be merged fast enough it
seems!
> +
> + regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &mmcc_msm8998_desc);
> + if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmcc_msm8998_hws); i++) {
> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, mmcc_msm8998_hws[i]);
I think we should make this common to the qcom_cc_desc now. Can you
throw in an optional list of clk_hw pointers that also get registered as
its own patch and update the existing drivers that are all doing this?
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &mmcc_msm8998_desc, regmap);
> +}
