On 2/5/2019 3:06 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-01-30 08:36:11)
[..]
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mmcc_msm8998_match_table);
+
+static int mmcc_msm8998_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ int i, ret;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+ struct clk *c;
+
+ c = devm_clk_get(dev, "xo");
+ if (!IS_ERR(c))
+ dummy_xo_init.parent_names =
+ (const char *[]){__clk_get_name(c)};
+ else
+ return PTR_ERR(c);
+
+ c = devm_clk_get(dev, "gpll0");
+ if (!IS_ERR(c))
+ dummy_gpll0_init.parent_names =
+ (const char *[]){__clk_get_name(c)};
+ else
+ return PTR_ERR(c);
Urgh, my parent mapping series can't come be merged fast enough it
seems!
Sorry, I'm not familiar with the context. Something I should incorporate?
+
+ regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &mmcc_msm8998_desc);
+ if (IS_ERR(regmap))
+ return PTR_ERR(regmap);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmcc_msm8998_hws); i++) {
+ ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, mmcc_msm8998_hws[i]);
I think we should make this common to the qcom_cc_desc now. Can you
throw in an optional list of clk_hw pointers that also get registered as
its own patch and update the existing drivers that are all doing this?
Yeah, can do.
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &mmcc_msm8998_desc, regmap);
+}
--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
