On 07/28, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > On 07/28/2017 04:21 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 07/20, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >> we have gcc_mmss_noc_cfg_ahb_clk marked with a CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED. While > >> this can prevent it from being disabled while its unused, it does not > >> prevent it from being disabled when a child derived from the clock calls > >> an explicit enable/disable. > > > > Do you mean the config_noc_clk_src is being disabled? Who is > > I think the issue I saw was after I switched the parent from > config_noc_clk_src to the RPM controlled cnoc_clk. That had to > be kept voted, else some other ahb clock derived from it being > disabled was causing the vote on cnoc_clk to be dropped. Hmm ok. Maybe we have some sort of bus driver vote from the multimedia clk driver in downstream code? Let me check. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
