On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 12:34, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 1/20/2025 2:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>> This doesn't follow the bindings, does it? > >> I will add and re-use the closest target compatible. > >> > >>>> + reg = <0 0x18323000 0 0x1400>, > >>>> + <0 0x18325800 0 0x1400>; > >>>> + reg-names = "freq-domain0", "freq-domain1"; > >>>> + > >>>> + clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>; > >>>> + clock-names = "xo", "alternate"; > >>> Are the DCVSH interrupts? > >>> > >> This target does not have DCVSH interrupts directly connected to the > >> CPUFREQ-HW. > > So, does it require a separate LMH driver, like the one used for sdm845? > > I will check how it is handled on QCS615 as it is closer to SC7180 and I > didn't see any LMH handling there as well. At least sm6150-thermal.dtsi declares two LMH blocks. -- With best wishes Dmitry
