On Friday 24 June 2016 11:37:59 Matthew McClintock wrote: [...] > Can you compare to this? > > https://gist.github.com/anonymous/38a44876ff4d2033e16e941408561b64 > > This is loading an initramfs image, also the earlycon cmdline bits should work properly as well. What exactly should I compare? This is 3.18 - so it is definitely not the mainstream Linux version of the patches but most likely your own codeaurora fork with the 2k or 4k patchbomb. But I've tried your bootargs. These broke the earlyprintk and didn't boot with v4.7-rc3. So the difference here doesn't seem to be the fdt load address. Kind regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
