On 01-10-24, 13:27, Dhruva Gole wrote: > On Sep 30, 2024 at 15:02:08 +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote: > > With the Silicon revision being taken directly from socinfo, there's no > > longer any need for reading any SOC register for revision from this driver. > > Hence, we do not require any rev_offset for AM62 family of devices. > > > > Also, maintain the backward compatibility with old devicetree, and hence > > add condition to handle the case where we have the zero offset such that we > > don't end up reading the wrong register offset in new AM625 DTs whenever we fix > > them up. > > > > These patches have been in discussion as part of another series, which is now > > being split up as per discussions with Nishanth. Ref. the following link for > > more context on the same: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240926-ti-cpufreq-fixes-v5-v7-0-3c94c398fe8f@xxxxxx/ > > > > **DEPENDS ON:** > > "mfd: syscon: Use regmap max_register_is_0 as needed" > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240903184710.1552067-1-nm@xxxxxx/ > > Just an update, the above dependency patch is now taken in by Lee Jones [1]. > Waiting for it to finally appear in -next. > > + Lee just because we are users of that patch. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/172770742318.523866.16912261914335612487.b4-ty@xxxxxxxxxx/ Ping me once this series is ready to be applied and all dependencies are merged somewhere I can rebase. -- viresh
