Viresh, On Oct 01, 2024 at 13:34:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 01-10-24, 13:27, Dhruva Gole wrote: > > On Sep 30, 2024 at 15:02:08 +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote: > > > With the Silicon revision being taken directly from socinfo, there's no > > > longer any need for reading any SOC register for revision from this driver. > > > Hence, we do not require any rev_offset for AM62 family of devices. > > > > > > Also, maintain the backward compatibility with old devicetree, and hence > > > add condition to handle the case where we have the zero offset such that we > > > don't end up reading the wrong register offset in new AM625 DTs whenever we fix > > > them up. > > > > > > These patches have been in discussion as part of another series, which is now > > > being split up as per discussions with Nishanth. Ref. the following link for > > > more context on the same: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240926-ti-cpufreq-fixes-v5-v7-0-3c94c398fe8f@xxxxxx/ > > > > > > **DEPENDS ON:** > > > "mfd: syscon: Use regmap max_register_is_0 as needed" > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240903184710.1552067-1-nm@xxxxxx/ > > > > Just an update, the above dependency patch is now taken in by Lee Jones [1]. > > Waiting for it to finally appear in -next. > > > > + Lee just because we are users of that patch. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/172770742318.523866.16912261914335612487.b4-ty@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Ping me once this series is ready to be applied and all dependencies > are merged somewhere I can rebase. I can see the dependency is part of next-20241003, please feel free to pick the series now if it looks ok to you. -- Best regards, Dhruva Gole Texas Instruments Incorporated
