> As pm_runtime_force_resume() can return error numbers, it should be > better to check the return value and deal with the exception. 1. Please improve such a change description with an imperative wording. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10#n94 2. Is there a need to complete the exception handling with a clk_unprepare() call? 3. How do you think about to use a summary phrase like “Return value from a pm_runtime_force_resume() call in bam_dma_resume()”? 4. Were any special source code analysis tools involved from your research organisation? Regards, Markus
