Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Handle the return value of bam_dma_resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:35:53PM GMT, Chen Ni wrote:
> As pm_runtime_force_resume() can return error numbers, it should be
> better to check the return value and deal with the exception.
> 
> Fixes: 0ac9c3dd0d6f ("dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: fix runtime PM underflow")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nichen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> index 5e7d332731e0..d2f5a77dfade 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> @@ -1460,9 +1460,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused bam_dma_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);

Which function will unroll the earlier clk_prepare() if we return an
error here?

>  }
>  
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops bam_dma_pm_ops = {
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux