On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:05:09AM +0100, Rayyan Ansari wrote: > > Hi Niklas, > > Yes, this patch does not depend on the following two patches, I just > thought that sending this as a series would make sense given that > patches 2-3 would surface this error (as we can run dtbs_check against > yaml bindings but not text bindings). Usually, DT maintainers prefer for DT bindings to go via subsystem trees (in this case libata). I guess DT maintainers could have picked the whole series, as they do occasionally, but they seem to want to avoid this as much as possible. In this case, considering that the DTS change (patch 1/3) is a strict fix, I think that it should be merged ASAP (target 6.11 instead of 6.12). We will queue the DT binding changes for 6.12. When also taking into consideration that the DT bindings and DTS changes have different trees, splitting the series was probably the right move. Kind regards, Niklas
