On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:38 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 26.06.2024 8:43 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 1:24 AM Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 6/23/24 13:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> >>>> Add support in drm/msm driver for the Adreno X185 gpu found in
> >>>> Snapdragon X1 Elite chipset.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 6 ++----
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 5 +++++
> >>>> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> >>>> index 0e3dfd4c2bc8..168a4bddfaf2 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> >>>> @@ -830,8 +830,10 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, unsigned int state)
> >>>> */
> >>>> gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CM3_CFG, 0x4052);
> >>>> + if (adreno_is_x185(adreno_gpu)) {
> >>>> + chipid = 0x7050001;
> >>>
> >>> What's wrong with using the logic below?
> >>
> >> patchid is BITS(7, 0), not (15, 8) in the case of x185. Due to the
> >> changes in the chipid scheme within the a7x family, this is a bit
> >> confusing. I will try to improve here in another series.
> >
> > I'm thinking we should just add gmu_chipid to struct a6xx_info, tbh
> >
> > Maybe to start with, we can fall back to the existing logic if
> > a6xx_info::gmu_chipid is zero so we don't have to add it for _every_
> > a6xx/a7xx
>
> If X185 is not the only occurence, I'd second this..
basically all a7xx are "special" compared to the original logic, so we
can start with using gmu_chipid for just a7xx
BR,
-R
> Konrad
