On 26.06.2024 8:43 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 1:24 AM Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/23/24 13:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>> Add support in drm/msm driver for the Adreno X185 gpu found in
>>>> Snapdragon X1 Elite chipset.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 6 ++----
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 5 +++++
>>>> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>>> index 0e3dfd4c2bc8..168a4bddfaf2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>>> @@ -830,8 +830,10 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, unsigned int state)
>>>> */
>>>> gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CM3_CFG, 0x4052);
>>>> + if (adreno_is_x185(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>> + chipid = 0x7050001;
>>>
>>> What's wrong with using the logic below?
>>
>> patchid is BITS(7, 0), not (15, 8) in the case of x185. Due to the
>> changes in the chipid scheme within the a7x family, this is a bit
>> confusing. I will try to improve here in another series.
>
> I'm thinking we should just add gmu_chipid to struct a6xx_info, tbh
>
> Maybe to start with, we can fall back to the existing logic if
> a6xx_info::gmu_chipid is zero so we don't have to add it for _every_
> a6xx/a7xx
If X185 is not the only occurence, I'd second this..
Konrad
