On 02/12, Lina Iyer wrote:
> @@ -101,6 +105,27 @@
> };
> };
>
> + CPU_PD: cpu-pd@0 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-states = <&CLUSTER_RET>, <&CLUSTER_PWR_DWN>;
Why isn't this part of the psci node? PSCI is the node that's
providing the code/logic for the power domain.
> + };
> +
> + pd-power-states {
> + CLUSTER_RET: power-state@1 {
> + state-param = <0x1000010>;
> + entry-latency-us = <500>;
> + exit-latency-us = <500>;
> + residency-us = <2000>;
> + };
> +
> + CLUSTER_PWR_DWN: power-state@2 {
> + state-param = <0x1000030>;
> + entry-latency-us = <2000>;
> + exit-latency-us = <2000>;
> + residency-us = <6000>;
> + };
> + };
> +
And I would expect these to be put somewhere inside the power
domain provider as well? Is this documented somewhere?
> psci {
> compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> method = "smc";
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
