On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 05:13:30PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > A trivial follow-up on the changes introduced in Commit 488164006a28 > ("thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent"). > > Should probably wait until v6.9-rc1 so that the patch in question is > in the base tree, otherwise TZs will fail to register. > > FWIW, Compile-tested only (except 8280). Please provide some more details on how you verified these patches (or that patch). Last time you said you just checked that the interrupt counters were incremented, which is not sufficient. Johan