On 19/03/2024 17:13, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
A trivial follow-up on the changes introduced in Commit 488164006a28
("thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent").
Should probably wait until v6.9-rc1 so that the patch in question is
in the base tree, otherwise TZs will fail to register.
FWIW, Compile-tested only (except 8280).
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Are you sure these changes are correct. They are not related to commit
488164006a28.
If the sensor has interrupt support, then it can specify:
polling-delay = <0>;
As a zero polling value can be omitted in the DT then it can be removed.
Then when a trip point is crossed, the interrupt fires but then it must
sample the temperature of the thermal zone to do the mitigation.
I doubt polling-delay-passive must be removed. The changes you
introduced just disable the mitigation and that will lead to board wild
reboots.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
