On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 14:28, Ritesh Kumar <quic_riteshk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/23/2024 11:34 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/23/24 16:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 15:43, Ritesh Kumar <quic_riteshk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 1/16/2024 6:27 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 14:06, Konrad Dybcio
> >>>> <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 1/16/24 10:49, Ritesh Kumar wrote:
> >>>>>> Enable Display Subsystem with Novatek NT36672E Panel
> >>>>>> on qcm6490 idp platform.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Kumar <quic_riteshk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 100
> >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> >>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> >>>>>> index 2a6e4907c5ee..efa5252130a1 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> >>>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >>>>>> #define PM7250B_SID 8
> >>>>>> #define PM7250B_SID1 9
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.h>
> >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
> >>>>>> #include "sc7280.dtsi"
> >>>>>> #include "pm7250b.dtsi"
> >>>>>> @@ -38,6 +39,25 @@
> >>>>>> stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> + lcd_disp_bias: lcd-disp-bias-regulator {
> >>>>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> >>>>>> + regulator-name = "lcd_disp_bias";
> >>>>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5500000>;
> >>>>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5500000>;
> >>>>>> + gpio = <&pm7250b_gpios 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >>>>>> + enable-active-high;
> >>>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >>>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_disp_bias_en>;
> >>>>> property-n
> >>>>> property-names
> >>>>>
> >>>>> all throughout the patch
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, I will update in the new version.
> >>>
> >>>>>> +&gpu {
> >>>>>> + status = "disabled";
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>> Hm.. generally we disable the GPU in the SoC DT, but that doesn't
> >>>>> seem to have happened here..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thinking about it more, is disabling it here necessary? Does it
> >>>>> not fail gracefully?
> >>>> Missed this.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd say, I don't see a reason to disable it at all. The GPU should be
> >>>> working on sc7280 / qcm4290.
> >>>
> >>> With GPU device node enabled, adreno_bind failure is seen as the
> >>> "speed_bin" was not populated on QCM6490 target which leads to display
> >>> bind failure.
> >>
> >> Excuse me please. The GPU node for sc7280 already has speed_bin, which
> >> points to qfprom + 0x1e9, bits 5 to 9.
> >>
> >> Do you mean that qcm6490 uses different speed bin location? Or
> >> different values for the speed bins?
> >>
> >>> Spoke with GPU team and on QCM6490 board, only CPU rendering is
> >>> supported for now and there is no plan to enable GPU rendering in near
> >>> future.
> >>
> >> This sounds like having the feature disabled for no particular reason.
> >> Both the kernel and Mesa have supported the Adreno 635 for quite a
> >> while.
> >
> > 643 [1], [2]
> >
> >>
> >>> In this regard, what do you suggest
> >>>
> >>> 1) Disable GPU in QCM6490 DT (as per the current patch)
> >>> 2) Disable GPU in the SoC DT, but enable it in other platform DTs.
> >>> (This
> >>> will prompt change in all the dt's and we don't have all the devices to
> >>> test)
> >>
> >> The second option definitely follows what is present on other platforms.
> >>
> >>> Please let me know your views on it.
> >>
> >> Please enable the GPU instead.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Konrad
> >
> > [1]
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/25408/diffs?commit_id=b1e851d66c3a3e53f1a464023f675f3f6cbd3503
> > [2]
> > https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20230926-topic-a643-v1-0-7af6937ac0a3@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Thanks for the help. After applying missing patches from series
> https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20230926-topic-a643-v1-0-7af6937ac0a3@xxxxxxxxxx/
> in my local build, GPU is working fine. GPU disablement change is not
> needed. I will send new version of patch removing GPU part and
> addressing other review comments.
Thank you!
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
