On 26.01.2024 03:34, Ling Xu wrote: > 在 2024/1/26 0:38, Konrad Dybcio 写道: >> >> >> On 1/25/24 11:24, Ling Xu wrote: >>> Add dma-coherent property to fastRPC context bank nodes to pass dma >>> sequence test in fastrpc sanity test, ensure that data integrity is >>> maintained during DMA operations. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ling Xu <quic_lxu5@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> How can we replicate this validation? >> >> Konrad > > Without this change, case8 and case14 about DMA sequence test in fastRPC sanity test can not pass. > > The steps to do fastRPC sanity test is: > 1.download code > p4 login > export PATH="$PATH:/prj/qct/asw/qctss/linux/bin/vce" > vce.py view --base fastrpctest.common.1.0 --checkout=<username> --root . I'm assuming it's not this one.. https://pypi.org/project/vce/ > 2.compile command > chmod -R 777 ./fastrpc_tests && python3 ./fastrpc_tests/build_fastrpc_test.py -target=LE > 3.run fastRPC test > fastrpc_tests_ReleaseG_push_LE.bat > adb shell fastrpc_tests -e (case number) -d 3 > I see, however there has been some talks about halting fastrpc developments until an open source userspace counterpart is ready, as upstream outright rejects binary glue.. That said, I am not sure whether I'd be against fixing up the devicetree component.. Konrad
