On 08/12/2015 07:47 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
@@ -702,6 +703,44 @@ static void print_ctx_regs(void __iomem *base, int ctx)
GET_PRRR(base, ctx), GET_NMRR(base, ctx));
}
+static void insert_iommu_master(struct device *dev,
+ struct msm_iommu_dev *iommu,
+ struct of_phandle_args *spec)
+{
+ struct msm_iommu_ctx_dev *master;
+ int sid;
+
+ master = kzalloc(sizeof(*master), GFP_KERNEL);
This is called with irqs disabled, but it's not GFP_ATOMIC. Please test
with DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y.
+ master->of_node = dev->of_node;
+ list_add(&master->list, &iommu->ctx_list);
+
+ for (sid = 0; sid < spec->args_count; sid++)
+ master->mids[sid] = spec->args[sid];
+
+ master->num_mids = spec->args_count;
+}
+
+static int qcom_iommu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,
+ struct of_phandle_args *spec)
+{
+ struct msm_iommu_dev *iommu;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&msm_iommu_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(iommu, &qcom_iommu_devices, dev_node) {
+ if (iommu->dev->of_node == spec->np)
+ break;
+ }
The braces are unnecessary here.
+
+ if (!iommu || (iommu->dev->of_node != spec->np))
Please remove extraneous parentheses.
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ insert_iommu_master(dev, iommu, spec);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msm_iommu_lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
irqreturn_t msm_iommu_fault_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct msm_iommu_dev *iommu = dev_id;
@@ -737,7 +776,7 @@ fail:
return 0;
}
-static const struct iommu_ops msm_iommu_ops = {
+static struct iommu_ops msm_iommu_ops = {
Is there a reason why we can't make of_iommu_set_ops() take a const ops
pointer?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
