On 23/06/15 10:26, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Joe,
>On Jun 23, 2015, at 05:52 , Joe Perches<joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:08 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>This patch adds just providers part of the framework just to enable easy
>>review.
>[]
>>include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 54 ++++++
>
>Unless there are going to be users of nvmem-provider.h
>outside of the drivers/nvmem directory, perhaps that
>file (and nvmem-consumer.h) should be in drivers/nvmem/
>
>
nvmem-consumer.h should be accessible from any driver, no?
And unfortunately nvmem-provider should be accessible too.
There are already eeprom drivers in the eeprom/misc directory that
cannot be moved yet to drivers/nvmem (like at24).
They need the provider definitions while they provide both the old
style interface, and the new NVMEM based one.
When we move them to the drivers/nvmem directory, then yes the
provider header file should move there.
Yep, that's the plan.
---srini
Regards
— Pantelis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
