Hi Joe, > On Jun 23, 2015, at 05:52 , Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:08 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: >> This patch adds just providers part of the framework just to enable easy >> review. > [] >> include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 54 ++++++ > > Unless there are going to be users of nvmem-provider.h > outside of the drivers/nvmem directory, perhaps that > file (and nvmem-consumer.h) should be in drivers/nvmem/ > > nvmem-consumer.h should be accessible from any driver, no? And unfortunately nvmem-provider should be accessible too. There are already eeprom drivers in the eeprom/misc directory that cannot be moved yet to drivers/nvmem (like at24). They need the provider definitions while they provide both the old style interface, and the new NVMEM based one. When we move them to the drivers/nvmem directory, then yes the provider header file should move there. Regards — Pantelis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
