Re: [PATCH v5 03/11] nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for nvmem providers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 24/06/15 01:24, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Can you assign the attributes to the device_type in the nvmem::struct
device? I don't see why these attributes need to be part of the class.

I will fix this.
>>
>>>+{
>>>+    return class_register(&nvmem_class);
>>
>>I thought class was on the way out? Aren't we supposed to use bus types
>>for new stuff?
>Do you remember any conversation on the list about this? I could not
>find it on web.
>
>on the other hand, nvmem is not really a bus, making it a bus type
>sounds incorrect to me.
>
I found this post on the cpu class that Sudeep tried to introduce[1].
And there's this post from Kay that alludes to a unification of busses
and classes[2]. And some other post where Kay says class is dead [3].
Thanks for the links,
Yep, looks like Class is dead, I will change the code to use bus type instead.


[1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/21/191
[2]https://lwn.net/Articles/471821/
[3]https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/11/17
--srini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux