On 2023-05-09 02:08:52, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 09/05/2023 00:46, Jessica Zhang wrote: > > > > > > On 5/7/2023 9:00 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote: > >> On 2023-05-05 14:23:50, Jessica Zhang wrote: > >>> Add DATA_COMPRESS feature flag to DPU INTF block. > >>> > >>> In DPU 7.x and later, DSC/DCE enablement registers have been moved from > >>> PINGPONG to INTF. > >>> > >>> As core_rev (and related macros) was removed from the dpu_kms struct, > >>> the > >>> most straightforward way to indicate the presence of this register > >>> would be > >>> to have a feature flag. > >> > >> Irrelevant. Even though core_rev was still in mainline until recently, > >> we always hardcoded the features in the catalog and only used core_rev > >> to select a dpu_mdss_cfg catalog entry. There is no "if version >= X > >> then enable feature Y" logic, this manually-enabled feature flag is the > >> only, correct way to do it. > > > > Hi Marijn, > > > > Understood. FWIW, if we do find more register bit-level differences > > between HW versions in the future, it might make more sense to keep the > > HW catalog small and bring core_rev back, rather than keep adding these > > kinds of small differences to caps. > > Let's see how it goes. Abhinav suggested that there might be feature > differences inside the DPU generations (and even inside the single DPU > major/minor combo). So I'm not sure what core_rev will bring us. > > Let's land the platforms which are ready (or if there is anything close > to be submitted). You mean waiting for catalog changes on the list specifically, so the DSC series as well as SM6350/SM6375? I do intend to send SM6125 now that the INTF TE series (required for it, as well as for SM63**) seems to be generally accepted, but have been quite busy with the DSC series on the list as we're now unblocking many Xperia's to finally have display! The catalog addition is "pretty much ready", let me know if you'd like it to be sent in prior to your cleanup. > I'll post the next proposal for the catalog cleanups > close to -rc4, when the dust settles then we can have one or two weaks > for the discussion and polishing. > > I'd like to consider: > - inlining foo_BLK macros, if that makes adding new features easier Sounds like a good idea. > - reformat of clk_ctrls > - maybe reintroduction of per-generation feature masks instead of > keeping them named after the random SoC Yes that would make things more clear. Or we can inline them entirely though that might accidentally diverge SoCs and revisions. > - maybe a rework of mdss_irqs / INTFn_INTR. We already have this info in > hw catalog. Sounds good as well, that should get rid of some "duplication". - Marijn
