Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/msm/dpu: Add DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS feature flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-05-05 14:23:50, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> Add DATA_COMPRESS feature flag to DPU INTF block.
> 
> In DPU 7.x and later, DSC/DCE enablement registers have been moved from
> PINGPONG to INTF.
> 
> As core_rev (and related macros) was removed from the dpu_kms struct, the
> most straightforward way to indicate the presence of this register would be
> to have a feature flag.

Irrelevant.  Even though core_rev was still in mainline until recently,
we always hardcoded the features in the catalog and only used core_rev
to select a dpu_mdss_cfg catalog entry.  There is no "if version >= X
then enable feature Y" logic, this manually-enabled feature flag is the
only, correct way to do it.

> Changes in v2:
> - Changed has_data_compress dpu_cap to a DATA_COMPRESS INTF feature flag
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> index 7944481d0a33..c74051906d05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
>  #define INTF_SC7180_MASK \
>  	(BIT(DPU_INTF_INPUT_CTRL) | BIT(DPU_INTF_TE) | BIT(DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED))
>  
> -#define INTF_SC7280_MASK INTF_SC7180_MASK | BIT(DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN)
> +#define INTF_SC7280_MASK INTF_SC7180_MASK | BIT(DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN) | BIT(DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS)

Konrad: Your SM6350/SM6375 series v3 [1] switched from INTF_SC7180_MASK
to INTF_SC7280_MASK to enable HCTL on SM6375, but that will now
erroneously also receive this feature flag and write the new
DATA_COMPESS mask even if it's DPU 6.9 (< 7.x where it got added).

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/80b46fcb-d6d0-1998-c273-5401fa924c7d@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

Depending on who lands first, this flag should be split.

I still see value in inlining and removing these defines, though that
brings a host of other complexity.

- Marijn

>  #define WB_SM8250_MASK (BIT(DPU_WB_LINE_MODE) | \
>  			 BIT(DPU_WB_UBWC) | \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> index 4eda2cc847ef..01c65f940f2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ enum {
>   * @DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN                Allows data to be transferred at different rate
>   *                                  than video timing
>   * @DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED       INTF block has INTF_STATUS register
> + * @DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS          INTF block has DATA_COMPRESS register
>   * @DPU_INTF_MAX
>   */
>  enum {
> @@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ enum {
>  	DPU_INTF_TE,
>  	DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN,
>  	DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED,
> +	DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS,
>  	DPU_INTF_MAX
>  };
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux