On 12/12/2022 13:33, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Register regions of the LLCC banks are located at separate addresses.
> Currently, the binding just lists the LLCC0 base address and specifies
> the size to cover all banks. This is not the correct approach since,
> there are holes and other registers located in between.
>
> So let's specify the base address of each LLCC bank and get rid of
> reg-names property as it is not needed anymore. It should be noted that
> the bank count differs for each SoC, so that also needs to be taken into
> account in the binding.
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.19
> Fixes: 7e5700ae64f6 ("dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc")
Also here there is no bug explained enough justifying backport of
bindings. Additionally, you effectively cannot backport bindings -
bindings from previous versions are still defining the ABI.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
