[PATCH] drm/msm/mdp5: Fix negative SMP block allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In case we request a number of SMP blocks which is lower than
the already reserved blocks, we should not try to allocate a
negative number, but 0 blocks instead.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Viau <sviau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c
index bf55188..1f795af89 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c
@@ -119,9 +119,10 @@ static int smp_request_block(struct mdp5_smp *smp,
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&smp->state_lock, flags);
 
-	nblks -= reserved;
-	if (reserved)
+	if (reserved) {
+		nblks = max(0, nblks - reserved);
 		DBG("%d MMBs allocated (%d reserved)", nblks, reserved);
+	}
 
 	avail = cnt - bitmap_weight(smp->state, cnt);
 	if (nblks > avail) {
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.

The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux