On 29/09/2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 29/09/2022 13:39, Neil Armstrong wrote:
The DTS looks correct unless you have some real argument that it is not.
How this should be fixed? First, drop bogus entries from drivers, then
document proper compatibles.
What do you mean ? There's no point to keep the PM8921 compatibles, the gpio
I asked at beginning - why? Why there is no point to keep them?
Because the HW is an PM8018 and the addition of the PM8921 was for policy/organization/struggling-to-make-dt-merged-before-clear-dt-policy/...
so you say I should modify the Bindings to reflect the actual "pm8018", "pm8921" situation instead of changing the DT even if incorrect ?
Yes, this is what I already wrote:
"How this should be fixed? First, drop bogus entries from drivers, then
document proper compatibles."
and PMIC bindings already enforces to only have the PM8018 compatible.
That is just partial argument because binding does not match DTS. So
something is not correct. Why do you assume bindings are correct?
Because bindings accurately reflects HW and DT doesn't.
That's not really an answer... Bindings are correct because they are
correct? What is exactly correct in the bindings? How they reflect the
HW in a proper way, while DTS does not?
Or let's focus on actual hardware - what are the properties of the
hardware which indicate that DTS is wrong?
The actual PMIC is an PM8018
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Neil
