On 17/05/2022 22:58, Robert Marko wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 17/05/2022 13:59, Robert Marko wrote: >>> Convert the bindings of Qualcomm SPMI regulators to DT schema. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> I am aware that syscon alone is not really acceptable, its converted >>> directly from the old text bindings. >>> >>> There is also the issue of some MSM8994, MSM8996 and APQ8096 devices using >>> '#address-cells', '#size-cells', some even defining reg property for >>> regulators. >>> >>> Any advice on how to solve these issues is appreciated. >>> >>> Changes in v2: >> >> Changelog goes after --- > > Ok, will fix up in v3. > > While we are here, > any ideas about the DTS-s that use reg and #address/size-cells for > regulator subnodes and syscon? Ideas for what exactly? It looks like a more of a subsystem convention, whether to use unit addresses for children which are not real devices (LEDs use unit addresses, regulators do not). Best regards, Krzysztof
