Hi
On 09/05/2014 05:26 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
<...>
+ reg-names = "hc_mem", "core_mem";
+ interrupts = <0 123 0>, <0 138 0>;
I see that you've used GPIO_ACTIVE_* above. Is the trailing zero here
possibly IRQ_TYPE_NONE?
Yes, it is. Will update it. Thanks!
+ interrupt-names = "hc_irq", "pwr_irq";
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core", "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ sdhci@f98a4900 {
+ compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4";
+ reg = <0xf98a4900 0x11c>, <0xf98a4000 0x800>;
+ reg-names = "hc_mem", "core_mem";
+ interrupts = <0 125 0>, <0 221 0>;
+ interrupt-names = "hc_irq", "pwr_irq";
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core", "iface";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
If you assign labels to these two nodes, you can reference them in the
.dts as &labelname {...};. Same for the uart node. That avoids
duplicating the hierarchy, detects spelling mistakes at compile time and
reduces indentation. Cf. the recent ifc6410 patch.
Sure, adding a label will not hurt.
Also, is sdhci the best node name here? Usually it's not supposed to
reflect the exact interface used (e.g., usb vs. ehci).
Ok, I'll figure out something better.
};
};
Otherwise looks good.
Thanks for reviewing!
BR,
Georgi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
