On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:42:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 09:27:17PM +0100, David Heidelberg wrote: > > Hello Manivannan, > > > > I'd like to ask, if you had any particular reason to name node `qcom,spmi@` > > instead of basic `spmi@`. > > > > "spmi" node label was not documented by devicetree spec at that time. So I was > using "qcom,spmi" but it was not correct either. > > I've submitted a PR now to devicetree-spec repo [1] for listing it as the > generic node name. So once it got accepted, we can use "spmi@" for the node > name. > PR is merged now. So you can proceed with using "spmi" node name in all dts. Thanks, Mani > Thanks, > Mani > > [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/pull/50 > > > I'm currently converting binding for > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb and I'm > > considering adding qcom,spmi into qcom,spmi-pmic-arb or just rename this and > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi `qcom,spmi@` occurences to `spmi@`. > > > > Ideas, inputs? > > > > Thank you > > David > > > >
