Hello Manivannan,I'd like to ask, if you had any particular reason to name node `qcom,spmi@` instead of basic `spmi@`.
I'm currently converting binding for Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb and I'm considering adding qcom,spmi into qcom,spmi-pmic-arb or just rename this and arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi `qcom,spmi@` occurences to `spmi@`.
Ideas, inputs? Thank you David
