On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 07:02 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 11:43 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > However, the device tree bindings are a different thing; as the > properties used to describe the hardware doesn't relate to how we > communicate with it I think we should be able to (and therefor should) > use the same documentation for the two (rather 7) chips. Agreed. > > >> Not sure. Björn patches cover older PMIC chips, if not mistaken, mine > >> cover PMIC's used with APQ8074 and onward [1]. Main difference is > >> the bus which connects them to SoC, interrupts handling, runtime > >> pin type detection and register map. > > > > Correct Ivan; we do however share the same issues related to how to do > interrupt handling, Yep, but do we actually need to do interrupt handling in driver? Interrupts are handled by parent device. GPIO client drivers could use interrupt-controller registered by core driver? > units for properties and how to split/reuse > between gpio and mpp. Also we have solved the pins vs groups vs > functions slightly different, that should all be aligned I think. Sure. <snip> > > Then I guess even if the chips are totally unrelated it'd be interesting > > to have you two guys cross-review each other's drivers so the behaviour > > is consistent across qualcomm platforms. > > > > I hope we can meet somewhere in between Sure. Regards, Ivan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
