On 9 July 2014 20:23, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: > I scanned this patch and subsequent patches from the series. Since you are > modifying the interfaces and bindings, I just think its better if we can > address the cases where separate clock lines will be used by CPUs. > > Surely don't want to increase your work neither want hold the progress > of the series but if you look at the changes to the interfaces, they > give you a feeling of incompleteness. Lets talk in the other thread you raised, 2/14 .. >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > Would you able to give some idea about what will it take to address that one > remainder case as well as part of this series. Which one? This: > We still *don't* support platforms with separate clock/voltage lines for CPUs. > This would be done in a separate patch. Its already fixed as part of this series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
