On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 27 June 2014 07:45, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 27 June 2014 07:23, Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> but it isn't future-proof if/when the clock framework starts returning
>>>> dynamically allocated clock pointers for each clk_get() invocation.
>>>> Maybe we need a function in the common clock framework that tells us if
>>>> the clocks are the same either via DT or by taking two clock pointers?
>>>
>>> I looked through the patch briefly and did not see why we would need to
>>> do this. Any hint?
>>
>> We want to know which CPUs are sharing clock line, so that we can
>> fill affected-cpus field of cpufreq core.
>
> What about comparing "clocks" property in cpu DT nodes?
What if a different clock is selected for some reason. I think a clock
api function would be better.
That being said, I don't really have any issue with such a function.
Some comments on the implementation.
>
> @Rob/Grant: I tried looking for an existing routine to do that, but couldn't
> find it. And so wrote one.
>
> I am not good at DT stuff and so I do hope there would be few correction
> required here. Let me know if this can be added to drivers/of/base.c :
>
> +/**
> + * of_property_match - Match property in two nodes
> + * @np1, np2: Nodes to match
> + * @list_name: property to match
> + *
> + * Returns 1 on match, 0 on no match, and error for missing property.
> + */
> +static int of_property_match(const struct device_node *np1,
> + const struct device_node *np2,
> + const char *list_name)
> +{
> + const __be32 *list1, *list2, *list1_end;
s/list/prop/
Everywhere.
> + int size1, size2;
> + phandle phandle1, phandle2;
> +
> + /* Retrieve the list property */
> + list1 = of_get_property(np1, list_name, &size1);
> + if (!list1)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + list2 = of_get_property(np2, list_name, &size2);
> + if (!list2)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (size1 != size2)
> + return 0;
> +
> + list1_end = list1 + size1 / sizeof(*list1);
> +
> + /* Loop over the phandles */
> + while (list1 < list1_end) {
> + phandle1 = be32_to_cpup(list1++);
> + phandle2 = be32_to_cpup(list2++);
> +
> + if (phandle1 != phandle2)
> + return 0;
> + }
You can just do a memcmp here.
This is wrong anyway because you don't know #clock-cells size.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
