On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:34:00AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in replying. Those cache bindings need an ACK
> to get merged, and were introduced so that idle states can retrieve
> power domain information for caches. I am going to revive the idle
> bindings thread to see what we can/should merge of these bindings as
> things stand, I really hope this won't block the series any further,
> otherwise we can rework the patches so that this series can get in
> first, or simplify my series to allow both to get merged as soon as
> possible without compromising future requirements.
Right, I think this is Stephen's call. AFAIR, the current state of
affairs is for a followup patchset to come up which I can ack for the
EDAC bits and then another maintainer picks the whole thing up.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
