On 12/05/2013 12:27 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:56:45PM +0000, Georgi Djakov wrote:
This platform driver adds the initial support of Secure
Digital Host Controller Interface compliant controller
found in Qualcomm MSM chipsets.
Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 13 +
drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 651 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 665 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
[...]
+static int sdhci_msm_dt_parse_vreg_info(struct device *dev,
+ struct sdhci_msm_reg_data *vreg,
+ const char *vreg_name)
+{
+ int len;
+ const __be32 *prop;
Seeing raw property handling in drivers worries me. If there's a reason
to touch the raw DTB we should add helpers to do it rather than leaking
binary format issues into drivers.
+ char prop_name[MAX_PROP_SIZE];
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+
+ snprintf(prop_name, MAX_PROP_SIZE, "%s-supply", vreg_name);
+ if (!of_parse_phandle(np, prop_name, 0)) {
+ dev_info(dev, "No vreg data found for %s\n", vreg_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ vreg->name = vreg_name;
+
+ snprintf(prop_name, MAX_PROP_SIZE, "qcom,%s-lpm-sup", vreg_name);
+ if (of_get_property(np, prop_name, NULL))
+ vreg->lpm_sup = true;
+
+ snprintf(prop_name, MAX_PROP_SIZE, "qcom,%s-voltage-level", vreg_name);
+ prop = of_get_property(np, prop_name, &len);
+ if (!prop || (len != (2 * sizeof(__be32)))) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "%s %s property\n",
+ prop ? "invalid format" : "no", prop_name);
+ } else {
+ vreg->low_vol_level = be32_to_cpup(&prop[0]);
+ vreg->high_vol_level = be32_to_cpup(&prop[1]);
+ }
You can use of_property_read_u32_array here.
+
+ snprintf(prop_name, MAX_PROP_SIZE, "qcom,%s-current-level", vreg_name);
+ prop = of_get_property(np, prop_name, &len);
+ if (!prop || (len != (2 * sizeof(__be32)))) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "%s %s property\n",
+ prop ? "invalid format" : "no", prop_name);
+ } else {
+ vreg->lpm_uA = be32_to_cpup(&prop[0]);
+ vreg->hpm_uA = be32_to_cpup(&prop[1]);
+ }
Likewise.
I will clean this up use only of_property_read_u32_array() and
of_property_read_bool() for DT parsing. Thanks!
[...]
+ /*
+ * CORE_SW_RST above may trigger power irq if previous status of PWRCTL
+ * was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before we enable the power irq
+ * interrupt in GIC (by registering the interrupt handler), we need to
+ * ensure that any pending power irq interrupt status is acknowledged
+ * otherwise power irq interrupt handler would be fired prematurely.
+ */
+ irq_status = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS);
+ writel_relaxed(irq_status, (msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CLEAR));
+ irq_ctl = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL);
+ if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON | CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF))
+ irq_ctl |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS;
+ if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH | CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW))
+ irq_ctl |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS;
+ writel_relaxed(irq_ctl, (msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL));
+ /*
+ * Ensure that above writes are propogated before interrupt enablement
+ * in GIC.
+ */
+ mb();
Does this guarantee that the device has finished responding to the write
and deasserted the interrupt line (i.e. does the device only acknowledge
the write once that is true)?
I am not sure that i understand your concern. The write to
CORE_PWRCTL_CTL should acknowledge and deassert the interrupt.
Thanks,
Georgi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
