Hi Bjorn,
> Hi Georgi,
>
> Thanks for working on this, unfortunately it seems like I need to port
> the rpm regulators to be able to test this.
> But I did find that...
>
Yes, the regulators support is still missing upstream. Until then, a basic
testing can be done by bypassing the regulators init part in order to use
the power on defaults for regulators and maybe also clocks.
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ...
>> +static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = (struct sdhci_msm_host *)data;
>> ...
>> +static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct sdhci_host *host;
>> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host;
>> ...
>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, msm_host->pwr_irq,
>> NULL,
>> + sdhci_msm_pwr_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), host);
>> ...
>
> ...sdhci_msm_pwr_irq() expects the data pointer to be msm_host, not
> sdhci_host, so right now I only get a panic. So I suspect you mean
> msm_host as the last param here.
Yes, you are right, I have also noticed this and it is fixed in the next
version which i will be posting in the next few days. Thanks!
BR,
Georgi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
