Hi Georgi, Thanks for working on this, unfortunately it seems like I need to port the rpm regulators to be able to test this. But I did find that... On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > +static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data) > +{ > + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = (struct sdhci_msm_host *)data; > ... > +static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct sdhci_host *host; > + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host; > ... > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, msm_host->pwr_irq, NULL, > + sdhci_msm_pwr_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT, > + dev_name(&pdev->dev), host); > ... ...sdhci_msm_pwr_irq() expects the data pointer to be msm_host, not sdhci_host, so right now I only get a panic. So I suspect you mean msm_host as the last param here. Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html