On 03/05/13 14:03, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/05/13 00:34, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi Stephen, Stepan,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:21:39PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> From: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add processor info for the Qualcomm, Inc. Krait family of
>>> processors, to use the generic ARMv7 initialisation
>>> procedure but explicitly enable the IDIV hardware
>>> capability flag.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
>>> index 3a3c015..81adeb3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
>>> @@ -434,6 +434,16 @@ __v7_ca15mp_proc_info:
>>> .size __v7_ca15mp_proc_info, . - __v7_ca15mp_proc_info
>>>
>>> /*
>>> + * Qualcomm Inc. Krait processors.
>>> + */
>>> + .type __krait_proc_info, #object
>>> +__krait_proc_info:
>>> + .long 0x510f0400 @ Required ID value
>>> + .long 0xff0ffc00 @ Mask for ID
>>> + __v7_proc __v7_setup, hwcaps = HWCAP_IDIV
>> I was looking at this the other day and wondered whether we could set
>> HWCAP_IDIV in __v7_setup, depending on ID_ISAR0[27:24]. I can't immediately
>> think why that would be difficult, but similarly there may well be a reason
>> why we assign it like this.
>>
>> Fancy taking a look?
> Ok I'll take a look.
Hmm. I wonder if we did it this way because between version B and C of
DDI0406 the definition of those bits changed.
In DDI0406B we have
0 - no support
1 - support
and in DDI0406C we have
0 - no support
1 - support in Thumb
2 - support in Thumb and ARM
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
