On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:03:10PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/05/13 00:34, Will Deacon wrote: > > I was looking at this the other day and wondered whether we could set > > HWCAP_IDIV in __v7_setup, depending on ID_ISAR0[27:24]. I can't immediately > > think why that would be difficult, but similarly there may well be a reason > > why we assign it like this. > > > > Fancy taking a look? > > Ok I'll take a look. Should we be masking out HWCAP_IDIVT on > !CONFIG_ARM_THUMB configurations? Yes, that's not a bad idea. It makes the IDIV* caps follow what we do for the others (vfp etc) by only advertising support if the relevant CONFIG options are selected. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
